Thank you!
Your support is sustaining the future of local news in our communities.

State denies closure of Sharon Hospital maternity unit

State denies closure of Sharon Hospital maternity unit
Lydia Moore, President of Save Sharon Hospital, told her story of recently giving birth at Sharon Hospital at a press conference on Wednesday, Aug. 30. Connecticut Comptroller Sean Scanlon and State Representative Maria Horn (D-64) stood behind her. Photo by Maud Doyle

UPDATE:  On Friday, September 8, the OHS granted Sharon Hospital an extension to appeal the OHS's Proposed Decision. The hospital, and its parent company Nuvance Health, now has until October 18, 2023 to file a brief and exceptions seeking a Certificate of Need to close the hospital's Labor and Delivery Unit.

SHARON — Sharon Hospital’s application to close its Labor and Delivery Unit was denied by Connecticut’s Office of Health Strategy (OHS) on Tuesday, Aug. 29.

The “proposed final decision” granted Sharon Hospital and its parent company, Nuvance Health, 21 days to appeal the decision. An appeal would continue a five-year battle between Sharon Hospital and members of the local community, led by Save Sharon Hospital, over maintaining the hospital’s labor and delivery services. 

Sharon Hospital filed a Certificate of Need to close the maternity unit with OHS in January 2022, citing financial concerns, declining birth rates in Litchfield County, and underutilization of its obstetrics unit.

The hospital, which has cited losses of more than $20 million in a single year, estimated that closing the maternity unit would save $3 million in large part by enabling the hospital to employ some 18 fewer staff members, and cut down on physician fees incurred by after-hours surgery and anesthesia services.

The hospital also described a decline in births at Sharon Hospital, citing fewer than one delivery per day in 2021, and difficulty attracting and retaining trained staff in a rural community.

At an OHS hearing in December 2022, doctors, advocates, and local families rebutted the hospital’s claims that closing the maternity unit would not impact access to adequate care in the region, and raised questions about the hospital’s claim that underutilization of the unit was causing irresolvable financial and safety concerns.

In its Aug. 29 decision, OHS found that Sharon Hospital had not adequately met five of eight applicable criteria to qualify for a Certificate of Need, repeatedly citing testimony from the December hearing, as well as supplementary materials provided by Save Sharon Hospital and others. 

Primarily, the decision to reject Sharon Hospital’s application rested on concerns about the closure’s impact on the accessibility of adequate care for pregnant women in the region. OHS emphasized the disproportionate effect this closure would have on people of color, the fastest-growing demographic in the region, and indigent people (more than 48% of Sharon Hospital’s labor and delivery patients paid through Medicaid in 2021).

The decision stated repeatedly that the burden of proof rested with the hospital and that the hospital had not succeeded in providing adequate evidence of either financial or safety concerns, nor adequate plans for alternatives for women in labor seeking care, especially for high-risk and emergent deliveries.

Though the hospital is non-profit, OHS took care to point out that its parent, Nuvance Health, provides financial support to Sharon Hospital, and, having ended 2021with a net increase in assets of $242 million and $1.7 billion in net assets, Nuvance is “by all accounts financially stable,” despite its operating losses at Sharon Hospital.

While there are other five other hospitals within an hour from Sharon, all able to accept women in labor, these options would require patients to make longer drives (the nearest hospital is Charlotte Hungerford in Torrington); OHS also cited concerns about these hospitals’ higher costs and lower safety ratings.

Gregg Pulver (R), Chairman of the Dutchess County Legislature, said that OHS’s decision was responsive to arguments from “representatives on both sides of the state line.” Patients at Sharon Hospital are more often from Dutchess County than from the Northwest Corner.

“Access to rural health care here is in crisis or at risk across the board,” said State Rep. Maria Horn (D-64). Though “it will always be a battle,” she said, “[We need] to keep this thriving hospital alive and vibrant and and helping all of us.”

Andrea Rynn, spokesperson for Nuvance Health, called the decision “concerning and disappointing.”

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), State Sen. Stephen Harding (R-30), U.S. Rep. Jahana Hayes (D-5), Rep. Horn, and State Comptroller Sean Scanlon all spoke in support of OHS’s preliminary decision at a press conference in Sharon Town Hall on Wednesday, Aug. 30.

Blumenthal called on Nuvance not to appeal OHS’s “well-reasoned, fully researched decision.”

“Nuvance has an obligation to listen to its customers, its patients, its community,” said the senator. “I am hopeful that meetings like this one will convince [Nuvance] that it can and should do the right thing.”

Horn drew a contrast between the diverse, fact-based testimonies provided by local healthcare professionals, and Nuvance’s “one single argument, that ‘this is just unsustainable,’ and ‘we can’t afford it.’”

Harding said, “I want to applaud the Office of Health for taking the time, not only with reading the testimony, but the whole process in general. I think they did a great job of listening to all sides of the story.”

Hayes noted that the threatened closure is indicative of national trends in rural and women’s healthcare access. “We have seen women’s reproductive health attacked all over the country,” she said. “So I am excited about today, but also looking forward and committed to […] bringing this 20 year battle [over the future of Sharon Hospital] to an end.”

Nearly all of the speakers thanked the local 501(c)(3) Save Sharon Hospital (SSH) for its instrumental work in preventing the closure of Sharon Hospital’s labor and delivery unit by marshaling skilled testimony from health care workers.

SSH President Lydia Moore, who gave birth to her youngest daughter in Sharon Hospital about two months ago, acknowledged the community for contributing “almost 12,000 pages of public comment,” overwhelmingly in favor of keeping labor and delivery open, as critical to the movement’s success.

Acknowledging that Nuvance can still appeal the OHS decision, Scanlon said, “We’re here today to say that this is good news, but the fight to maintain access to affordable, quality health care, especially when it comes to labor and delivery, is going to continue beyond this morning.”

As of Sept. 4, Nuvance has not yet announced if it will appeal the decision.

“As part of a nonprofit health system, Sharon Hospital faces financial and operational challenges moving forward,” said Rynn in a statement. “We will be considering all options available as we reassess our path forward.”

Latest News

Slow fashion takes the runway at Stone Ridge Orchard

The organic runway at HVSFW puts sustainable style among the apple trees at Stone Ridge Orchard.

Jay Ballesteros

Fast fashion has made it possible to buy the latest trend almost as quickly as it appears on social media. The environmental cost, however, is anything but fleeting. Fashion production accounts for about 10% of global carbon emissions, consumes enormous quantities of water and energy, and an estimated 85% of textiles end up in landfills each year. Synthetic fabrics also shed microplastics when washed.

So what would happen if we slowed things down?

Keep ReadingShow less
google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

Susan Schneider and the magic of marbling
Susan Schneider, owner of Shandell’s in Ashley Falls, in her studio.
Susan Schneider, owner of Shandell’s in Ashley Falls, in her studio.
It’s a joyful process. —Susan Schneider

A beautiful September morning found Susan Schneider of Shandell’s working in her Ashley Falls home studio, while linen cocktail napkins she had marbled the day before hung on a line outside her back door. Her helpers, dogs Daisy and Stubbs, are never far from her.

“Marbling,” Schneider explained, “the art of floating paint on a liquid and printing it on a medium, has been around for hundreds of years.”

Keep ReadingShow less

Through the lens of war

Through the lens of war

“Omaha Beach Rescue, D-Day +1, Normandy, June 7, 1944.” one of the best-known photographs of D-Day.

Walter Rosenblum

Longtime Norfolk resident Nina Rosenblum will present her award-winning documentary, “They Fight With Cameras,” on Saturday, Sept. 26, at 6:30 p.m. at the Norfolk Library.

The film tells the story of her father, decorated U.S. Army Signal Corps combat cameraman Walter Rosenblum.

Keep ReadingShow less
Brian Gersten finds the story in the overlooked

Filmmaker Brian Gersten

D.H. Callahan

At 6 p.m. on Saturday, Sept. 26, award-winning filmmaker Brian Gersten will screen four short documentaries at the David M. Hunt Library in Falls Village, exploring obscure topics such as a lingering territorial dispute between the United States and Canada, a nationwide toilet paper panic sparked by a late-night joke, the infamous “Balloon Boy” saga and the history of bowling in America.

The Chicago-raised, Millerton-based filmmaker has worked as an editor on feature-length documentaries like the cycling film “Enter the Slipstream” and Netflix’s profile on author Tom Wolfe, “Radical Wolfe.” In 2025, “Why We Dream,” a film he edited about bringing D-Day veterans back to the beaches of Normandy, premiered aboard the U.S.S. Intrepid in New York City. When it comes to directing, Gersten’s own interests focus more on the underappreciated and unremembered, as the four short films he directed will demonstrate.

Keep ReadingShow less
google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

google preferred source

Want more of our stories on Google? Click here to make us a Preferred Source.