Amenia site approval lands Planning Board in court

Amenia site approval lands
Planning Board in court

Amenia Town Hall

John Coston

AMENIA — The Town of Amenia Planning Board’s decision to grant a waiver permitting construction of a house on a scenic ridgeline has landed in State Supreme Court in Dutchess County.

Petitions from a local farming family have been filed in the court seeking a judgment annulling the Planning Board’s actions through an Article 78 proceeding.

Article 78 lawsuits are used to challenge actions taken by state or local governments.

Barbara C. Meili, Joerg E. Meili and Arrowhead Hills Partners L.P. are members of a local farming family that have owned several properties contiguous to or near the ridgeline property for decades, according to court filings.

Cameron O. Smith and Liza Vann Smith own the ridgeline land on 27 acres at 108 Westerly Ridge Drive in Amenia. Court records state they purchased the land in 2005 for $850,000. It currently is listed for sale by Compass for $1,249,000.

The land is advertised as “perched at the very top of Westerly Ridge in Amenia, and surrounded by forever protected land under DLC conservation easement, lies the most exceptional building opportunity. There are panoramic 270-degree views, far and wide down the Oblong Valley to the south, across the Amenia hills to the west, and up into Sharon to the east, offering distant and varied views of the surrounding beauty.”

The ad mentions the parcel has “an approved building envelope,” an attribute made possible by the waiver issued by the Planning Board.

The petitioners cite town code that states that site plan approval must meet a standard that is 40 feet below the crestline of any ridge and doesn’t disturb “the continuity of the treeline when viewed from a publicly accessible place.” According to the code, chimneys, satellite dishes, antennas, or cupolas may project higher, but “shall not be higher than 30 feet below the crest line.”

The Smiths’ property is in a rural agricultural zone and in a Scenic Protection Overlay (SPO) District, which is why the waiver was required for building.

In 2019, the Planning Board granted the Smiths a waiver and site plan approval, but the waiver subsequently expired. In August 2023, the Planning Board reapproved the waiver, prompting the petitioners to file their suit in the Supreme Court claiming “substantive and procedural errors” on the board’s part.

Subsequent to the September filing in Supreme Court, the Planning Board, petitioners claim, reapproved the application at an Oct. 25 meeting in an attempt “to rectify its mistakes” and address concerns raised in the lawsuit. The petitioners also claim that the Oct. 25 meeting failed to include discussion of claims made in the original petition, or of letters received by the board objecting to approval and that petitioners were not allowed to speak at the meeting.

Filings by the Planning Board and the landowners argue that the reapproval was granted upon a full record, and that the Planning Board applied the correct standard for granting a waiver. The response also states that the Smiths’ application appropriately was identified as a “minor project” and as such the board was authorized to waive a public hearing.

The board also holds that the application didn’t require an environmental review under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR), which calls for local agencies to examine environmental impacts along with social and economic considerations. The board also states that its approval doesn’t conflict with the town’s Comprehensive Plan.

In a recent filing on Feb. 22, the Planning Board stated: “Petitioners’ opposition to the Project, as evidenced in their submission, is simply based on Petitioners’ mere disagreement with the rational conclusion reached by the Planning Board, and not based on any deficiencies in the Planning Board’s review process.”

Justice Thomas R. Davis has the case.

Latest News

Millerton’s 175th committee advances plans for celebration, seeks vendors and sponsors

The Millerton 175th anniversary committee's tent during the village's trunk-or-treat event on Oct. 31, 2025.

Photo provided

MILLERTON — As Millerton officially enters its 175th year, the volunteer committee tasked with planning its milestone celebration is advancing plans and firming up its week-long schedule of events, which will include a large community fair at Eddie Collins Memorial Park and a drone light show. The events will take place this July 11 through 19.

Millerton’s 175th committee chair Lisa Hermann said she is excited for this next phase of planning.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why the focus on Greenland?

As I noted here in an article last spring entitled “Hands off Greenland”, the world’s largest island was at the center of a developing controversy. President Trump was telling all who would listen that, for national security reasons, the United States needed to take over Greenland, amicably if possible or by force if necessary. While many were shocked by Trump’s imperialistic statements, most people, at least in this country, took his words as ill-considered bluster. But he kept telling questioners that he had to have Greenland (oftenechoing the former King of France, Louis XIV who famously said, “L’État c’est moi!”.

Since 1951, the U.S. has had a security agreement with Denmark giving it near total freedom to install and operate whatever military facilities it wanted on Greenland. At one point there were sixteen small bases across the island, now there’s only one. Denmark’s Prime Minister has told President Trump that the U.S. should feel free to expand its installations if needed. As climate change is starting to allow a future passage from thePacific Ocean to the Arctic, many countries are showing interest in Greenland including Russia and China but this hardly indicates an international crisis as Trump and his subordinates insist.

Keep ReadingShow less
Military hardware as a signpost

It is hard not to equate military spending and purchasing with diplomatic or strategic plans being made, for reasons otherwise unknown. Keeping an eye out for the physical stuff can often begin to shine a light on what’s coming – good and possibly very bad.

Without Congressional specific approval, the Pentagon has awarded a contract to Boeing for $8,600,000,000 (US taxpayer dollars) for another 25 F-15A attack fighters to be given to Israel. Oh, and there’s another 25 more of the F-15EX variant on option, free to Israel as well.

Keep ReadingShow less
Truth and evidence depend on the right to observe

A small group of protesters voice opposition to President Trump's administration and Immigration and Customs Enforcement at Amenia's Fountain Square at the intersection of Route 44 and Route 22 on Saturday, Nov. 8, 2025

Photo by Nathan Miller

The fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, and before him Renée Good, by federal agents in Minnesota is not just a tragedy; it is a warning. In the aftermath, Trump administration officials released an account of events that directly contradicted citizen video recorded at the scene. Those recordings, made by ordinary people exercising their rights, showed circumstances sharply at odds with the official narrative. Once again, the public is asked to choose between the administration’s version of events and the evidence of its own eyes.

This moment underscores an essential truth: the right to record law enforcement is not a nuisance or a provocation; it is a safeguard. As New York Times columnist David French put it, “Citizen video has decisively rebutted the administration’s lies. The evidence of our eyes contradicts the dishonesty of the administration’s words.”

Keep ReadingShow less