Defund the police? Not if you want to stay safe

According to the Minnesota newspaper, the Star Tribune, organizers of the social justice group, Black Visions, who are charging the Minneapolis Police Department “can’t be reformed through initiatives like training and body cameras” and therefore should be dismantled, are working to envision a “police-free future.” According to Star Tribune reporter Liz Navratil, reformers plan to invest in more “community initiatives like mental health and having community members respond to public safety issues.”

OK, there’s nothing wrong with adding community initiatives that strengthen mental health support, and maybe it’s all right to have properly trained community members who can safely respond to public safety issues when it’s appropriate to do so. And that’s a big maybe, dependent on a lot. But why do police departments have to be sacrificed for that to happen?

Yet that is exactly what nine out of 12 Minneapolis City Council members announced that they plan to do on Sunday, June 7, nearly two weeks after the May 25 killing of 46 year old George Floyd, a Black man, by 44 year old White ex-cop Derek Chauvin. Floyd’s death has sparked protests around the world about police brutality and systemic racism, reigniting the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. Those protests have headed in what we consider a dangerous direction — with demonstrators calling for police departments to be defunded — but do protesters really know what they’re asking for? 

There is a need for police reform: increased training, improved community outreach, more sensitivity. Absolutely. There’s always room for improvement. However, abolishing law enforcement would give free rein to criminal minds intent on doing harm. What we need is a societal change.

And although a veto-proof majority of the Minneapolis City Council wants to disband its police force, the city’s mayor does not. Mayor Jacob Frey said this past weekend that he does not support “the full abolition of the police department” to a jeering crowd, which forced him to flee a rally he was at.

“People continue to require service in many forms from our public safety offices, whether in times of domestic violence, or assistance in some of the most dire conditions,” he said in a Sunday interview, according to the Star Tribune article. 

He’s absolutely right. It is a matter of public safety. Our own Governor Andrew Cuomo knows that all too well, commenting on New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s Sunday, June 7, statement that he wants to cut city funding for its police department after 10 nights of protesters calling for change. Though de Blasio was vague with figures, he said he wants to divert money from the department’s annual $6 billion budget to social services. He has until July 1 to hash out the details for his roughly $90 billion city budget with the City Council, of which roughly 6% typically goes toward policing.

But Cuomo said no way will New York police be defunded at his Sunday night press conference — stressing the key role the police play in protecting the public — especially during times of upheaval and unrest like we’re currently experiencing.

“Look at that looting. It was frightening,” the governor said. “It was criminals who were exploiting the situation who were opportunistic, who were just stealing.”

That doesn’t mean lawmakers are unwilling to take action. Congressional Democrats unveiled legislation Monday, June 8, for nationwide standards for police accountability. Though the bill does not deal with defunding police departments, it does mandate states and municipalities implement mandatory bias training in order to qualify for federal funds, according to The New York Times.

U.S. Rep. Karen Bass (D-CA), the Democratic chairwoman of the House’s Congressional Black Caucus, spoke about the bill on CNN on Sunday. 

“I don’t believe that you should disband police departments,” she said. “But I do think that in cities and states, we need to look at how we are spending resources and invest more in our communities.”

Democrats in the House and Senate named the bill the Justice in Policing Act of 2020. It aims to fight racial inequality and excessive use of force by law enforcement. According to The New York Times, “It would create a national registry to track police misconduct and require that law enforcement agencies report data on the use of force, as well as ban certain chokeholds and other practices … that left black Americans dead.”

So, there are options other than dismantling our police departments — departments made up of men and women who, by and large, bravely and honorably serve to protect each and every one of us when we need them most. Please, take a moment to imagine a world without police. Who would help you when your dog gets stolen, when you get mugged, when your wife or daughter is raped, when your child is kidnapped, when your mother or father is killed, or your car is vandalized, when your business or home is burglarized, when your child’s school is threatened with a bomb or a mass shooting, when you have an accident or any other kind of emergency? There are so many reasons why we depend on the police. Make no mistake about it — the police are essential to keeping law and order — and law and order are essential to maintaining a civil society — and isn’t that what we all want and deserve?

Latest News

Millerton’s 175th committee advances plans for celebration, seeks vendors and sponsors

The Millerton 175th anniversary committee's tent during the village's trunk-or-treat event on Oct. 31, 2025.

Photo provided

MILLERTON — As Millerton officially enters its 175th year, the volunteer committee tasked with planning its milestone celebration is advancing plans and firming up its week-long schedule of events, which will include a large community fair at Eddie Collins Memorial Park and a drone light show. The events will take place this July 11 through 19.

Millerton’s 175th committee chair Lisa Hermann said she is excited for this next phase of planning.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why the focus on Greenland?

As I noted here in an article last spring entitled “Hands off Greenland”, the world’s largest island was at the center of a developing controversy. President Trump was telling all who would listen that, for national security reasons, the United States needed to take over Greenland, amicably if possible or by force if necessary. While many were shocked by Trump’s imperialistic statements, most people, at least in this country, took his words as ill-considered bluster. But he kept telling questioners that he had to have Greenland (oftenechoing the former King of France, Louis XIV who famously said, “L’État c’est moi!”.

Since 1951, the U.S. has had a security agreement with Denmark giving it near total freedom to install and operate whatever military facilities it wanted on Greenland. At one point there were sixteen small bases across the island, now there’s only one. Denmark’s Prime Minister has told President Trump that the U.S. should feel free to expand its installations if needed. As climate change is starting to allow a future passage from thePacific Ocean to the Arctic, many countries are showing interest in Greenland including Russia and China but this hardly indicates an international crisis as Trump and his subordinates insist.

Keep ReadingShow less
Military hardware as a signpost

It is hard not to equate military spending and purchasing with diplomatic or strategic plans being made, for reasons otherwise unknown. Keeping an eye out for the physical stuff can often begin to shine a light on what’s coming – good and possibly very bad.

Without Congressional specific approval, the Pentagon has awarded a contract to Boeing for $8,600,000,000 (US taxpayer dollars) for another 25 F-15A attack fighters to be given to Israel. Oh, and there’s another 25 more of the F-15EX variant on option, free to Israel as well.

Keep ReadingShow less
Truth and evidence depend on the right to observe

A small group of protesters voice opposition to President Trump's administration and Immigration and Customs Enforcement at Amenia's Fountain Square at the intersection of Route 44 and Route 22 on Saturday, Nov. 8, 2025

Photo by Nathan Miller

The fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, and before him Renée Good, by federal agents in Minnesota is not just a tragedy; it is a warning. In the aftermath, Trump administration officials released an account of events that directly contradicted citizen video recorded at the scene. Those recordings, made by ordinary people exercising their rights, showed circumstances sharply at odds with the official narrative. Once again, the public is asked to choose between the administration’s version of events and the evidence of its own eyes.

This moment underscores an essential truth: the right to record law enforcement is not a nuisance or a provocation; it is a safeguard. As New York Times columnist David French put it, “Citizen video has decisively rebutted the administration’s lies. The evidence of our eyes contradicts the dishonesty of the administration’s words.”

Keep ReadingShow less