The Dover Project: will there be a substation in Dover?

DOVER — Many people who check in on social networks may have seen recently that Concerned Citizens of Dover (CCD) invited neighbors, including specifically Millbrook and Millerton/North East, to attend the Town of Dover Planning Board meeting on Monday, Nov. 21.

Among other items on the agenda was a third public hearing for Transco’s Dover Project, the building of an energy substation in the town.

The Planning Board met discussing old business, then new business; they moved on to the public hearing portion of the meeting with the first order of business the Stonybrook Estates item, which was held over until Dec. 5, and then on to the business that attracted most of the residents who attended, the NY Transco LLC and the Dover Sub Station.

If one remembers the furor over the Cricket Valley Energy Center (CVEC) a few years ago, this is no less critical to the residents, perhaps more so, because CVEC already exists, not far from where this new station would be located, at Routes 22 and 26. CVEC uses natural gas to produce electricity.

While not as large, many people feel it will be an eyesore, that it will not benefit the town, and if anything, will have a detrimental effect on the area in many ways, including aesthetically and financially, as it will probably impact real estate values.

The Dover Station Project, as proposed by NY Transco, is described as a network upgrade electric substation, needed as New York State evolves to clean, efficient and resilient energy.

Transco says that it is the perfect — and only —site that can be used because it is the correct distance between the Connecticut border and Pleasant Valley, where another energy plant is located. It connects to Con Ed’s 398 line, has proximity to Connecticut while still being in New York State, and is on a state highway.

Transco first submitted an application to the Dover Planning Board in October 2021  for a Special Permit/Site Plan with Erosion and Sediment control. It hoped for construction during 2022-2023, and be ready to start service toward the end of 2023.

Sam Johnson, of Transco, gave a presentation which he said was in answer to the public comments heard at the prior two meetings concerning Transco and the Dover Project. He said that the station will be remotely controlled, will cause no traffic congestion, will have no night lighting and will not produce any emissions. It will be fully landscaped with 250 new plantings and a fence. The station will not block power, but will control the flow, and will be an improvement over the existing site, which was a junk yard and building materials storage site.

Transco promises that this substation will increase local tax revenue, but Concerned Citizens of Dover wants residents to take a closer look at what Transco is proposing and at its promises. On CCD’s website the group states that some power companies don’t pay their fair share of taxes, and they cite in particular CVEC.

They state: “According to an audit of the Industrial Development Agency (IDA) by Dutchess County Comptroller, Robin Lois — in 2017,  CVEC should’ve paid the town $11.7 million dollars in property taxes but they paid us $109,521 dollars instead. It’s called a PILOT payment (payment in lieu of taxes).

“They should’ve paid $59 million in school taxes but they only paid $552,559 instead. Through 2050, the gas plant will have avoided paying $1 billion dollars in taxes.”

Transco says that the project will not have adverse impact on historic or cultural sources; will have an avoidance of environmental impact, or any impact on federally regulated waters. In fact, Johnson stated that there will be no use of water at all at the substation. They say it has been declared No Hazard, and they can voluntarily remove debris from a wetland buffer zone.

Many residents oppose the project because they feel it will impact the natural habitat of animals and plant life in the area, in particular the Great Swamp and Dover Stone Church. Others say that it won’t benefit Dover, but will be beneficial to Westchester, Long Island and New York City.

The CCD group also calls attention to the fact that the state, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and New York’s Department of Environmental Conservation already consider some of Dover disadvantaged, financially and environmentally, suffering pollution from dirty industries, nor are they happy about the existing Cricket Valley Energy Center.

Out of the many comments from those attending, only one citizen said she was in favor of the substation, commenting that when she needs light, or is cold, she likes turning on a switch and getting light or heat.

Another landowner said, “I bought this property 30 years ago to look at trees, not towers.”

Several residents mentioned the fact that the project is close to the Dover High School, which already has a problem with polluted water. Most were concerned about property values, and the demise of wildlife and the general loss of the rustic beauty.

There were some people from neighboring towns there, and Transco will again be at the Planning Board meeting on Dec. 19.

Latest News

Millerton’s 175th committee advances plans for celebration, seeks vendors and sponsors

The Millerton 175th anniversary committee's tent during the village's trunk-or-treat event on Oct. 31, 2025.

Photo provided

MILLERTON — As Millerton officially enters its 175th year, the volunteer committee tasked with planning its milestone celebration is advancing plans and firming up its week-long schedule of events, which will include a large community fair at Eddie Collins Memorial Park and a drone light show. The events will take place this July 11 through 19.

Millerton’s 175th committee chair Lisa Hermann said she is excited for this next phase of planning.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why the focus on Greenland?

As I noted here in an article last spring entitled “Hands off Greenland”, the world’s largest island was at the center of a developing controversy. President Trump was telling all who would listen that, for national security reasons, the United States needed to take over Greenland, amicably if possible or by force if necessary. While many were shocked by Trump’s imperialistic statements, most people, at least in this country, took his words as ill-considered bluster. But he kept telling questioners that he had to have Greenland (oftenechoing the former King of France, Louis XIV who famously said, “L’État c’est moi!”.

Since 1951, the U.S. has had a security agreement with Denmark giving it near total freedom to install and operate whatever military facilities it wanted on Greenland. At one point there were sixteen small bases across the island, now there’s only one. Denmark’s Prime Minister has told President Trump that the U.S. should feel free to expand its installations if needed. As climate change is starting to allow a future passage from thePacific Ocean to the Arctic, many countries are showing interest in Greenland including Russia and China but this hardly indicates an international crisis as Trump and his subordinates insist.

Keep ReadingShow less
Military hardware as a signpost

It is hard not to equate military spending and purchasing with diplomatic or strategic plans being made, for reasons otherwise unknown. Keeping an eye out for the physical stuff can often begin to shine a light on what’s coming – good and possibly very bad.

Without Congressional specific approval, the Pentagon has awarded a contract to Boeing for $8,600,000,000 (US taxpayer dollars) for another 25 F-15A attack fighters to be given to Israel. Oh, and there’s another 25 more of the F-15EX variant on option, free to Israel as well.

Keep ReadingShow less
Truth and evidence depend on the right to observe

A small group of protesters voice opposition to President Trump's administration and Immigration and Customs Enforcement at Amenia's Fountain Square at the intersection of Route 44 and Route 22 on Saturday, Nov. 8, 2025

Photo by Nathan Miller

The fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, and before him Renée Good, by federal agents in Minnesota is not just a tragedy; it is a warning. In the aftermath, Trump administration officials released an account of events that directly contradicted citizen video recorded at the scene. Those recordings, made by ordinary people exercising their rights, showed circumstances sharply at odds with the official narrative. Once again, the public is asked to choose between the administration’s version of events and the evidence of its own eyes.

This moment underscores an essential truth: the right to record law enforcement is not a nuisance or a provocation; it is a safeguard. As New York Times columnist David French put it, “Citizen video has decisively rebutted the administration’s lies. The evidence of our eyes contradicts the dishonesty of the administration’s words.”

Keep ReadingShow less