Anti-maskers fight science

To mask or not to mask? That seems to be the question on millions of Americans’ minds these days, as the coronavirus pandemic sweeps across the nation, killing hundreds of thousands of our men and women who only months ago were leading vibrant lives surrounded by their loved ones. 

Now, 10 months after COVID-19 hit our shores, it’s hard to believe that people in the U.S. are still debating whether donning a face mask can help slow the spread of the deadly respiratory virus — and if it’s worth the simple act of placing a small piece of material securely across one’s mouth and nose to prevent viral particles from going airborne and possibly infecting others with a disease that could easily kill them. 

Science has proven it is. Medical experts the world over have supported that science. There is clearly evidence to demonstrate that wearing a mask is the responsible thing for all to do, everyday, to protect those around us — family, friend or stranger.

Yet still, there are those among us who don’t believe. There are those who seem to think the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) — nonpolitical medical organizations — are lying when they say wearing masks saves lives — and instead are politically motivated in their messaging rather than based in fact. 

Now, after watching the nightly newscast and reading the morning news, you may believe those “anti-maskers” live in places far removed, perhaps in Wyoming, where that state’s Republican governor, Mark Gordon, resisted mandating masks until he himself became infected with COVID-19 at the end of November. Or perhaps you think those naysayers live in Kansas City, Mo., where the CDC tracked trends of counties with and without a mask mandate. 

NPR reported on the CDC’s Kansas City study, and interviewed Dr. Rex Archer, a Kansas City physician who heads the  COVID-19 treatment center at St. Luke’s Health System.

“We’ve had this huge swing that’s occurred because [people are] not wearing masks, and yes, that’s putting pressure on our hospitals…” Archer told NPR.  

According to the CDC study: “Wearing face masks in public spaces reduces the spread of SARS-CoV-2.” 

Again, science doesn’t lie.

Even President Elect Joe Biden has asked every American to mask up for the first 100 days after he takes office in January. He told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Thursday, Dec. 3, that the request is, “Not forever. One hundred days. And I think we’ll see a significant reduction.” 

But getting back to the anti-maskers, the ones we’ve been referring to in this editorial, they do not live in the Midwest or the far reaches of the U.S., they live right here in the Harlem Valley. This week, we spoke to people who reside and do business locally in Millerton and its surrounds who fall on both sides of the mask debate; you can find that article on our front page. We hope you’ll take the time to read it.

So while you may be trying to keep yourself and your loved ones safe, cocooned securely in your home as much as possible, only going out for necessities, wearing a mask and keeping socially distanced, there are others, perhaps your friends and neighbors, who are not following our governor’s safety guidelines, our health department’s guidelines, the CDC’s guidelines, our president elect’s guidelines. They believe they know better. We’re not saying they’re acting out of ill-will or spite, that they’re intentionally trying to make others sick or to kill anyone. Of course not. But the fact is that is exactly what their actions could lead to — intentional or not.

And then there are those who do act belligerently when they are asked to put on a mask — as they are required to do in the State of New York when in a public place — by people who are justly concerned about catching the virus. To those acting out, please, just stop it. Such hostility is unnecessary. Being asked to put on a mask is not inappropriate. We are in the midst of a deadly global pandemic. As of Tuesday, Dec. 8, more than 1.5 million people have died worldwide. It takes courage to speak up when someone’s actions jeopardize another person’s life.

Responding by coughing on a person, yelling at a person, cursing at a person, intimidating a person, threatening a person, physically assaulting a person — such behavior is unacceptable, bordering on being criminal  — if not actually being criminal. We can’t sanction such actions and hope others agree, including the law. 

The bottom line here is that the issue of wearing a face mask — a simple step that can save lives — should not be politicized. Today, as we face this ever-growing pandemic together, as a community, putting on a face mask should be as routine as putting on a jacket before heading out for a chilly day. It’s a protective measure, not just for yourself, but for others as well. Think outside of yourself. Once the New Year arrives we’ll be well-nigh on a year of the coronavirus. It’s long past time to for all of America to finally mask-up.

Latest News

Millerton’s 175th committee advances plans for celebration, seeks vendors and sponsors

The Millerton 175th anniversary committee's tent during the village's trunk-or-treat event on Oct. 31, 2025.

Photo provided

MILLERTON — As Millerton officially enters its 175th year, the volunteer committee tasked with planning its milestone celebration is advancing plans and firming up its week-long schedule of events, which will include a large community fair at Eddie Collins Memorial Park and a drone light show. The events will take place this July 11 through 19.

Millerton’s 175th committee chair Lisa Hermann said she is excited for this next phase of planning.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why the focus on Greenland?

As I noted here in an article last spring entitled “Hands off Greenland”, the world’s largest island was at the center of a developing controversy. President Trump was telling all who would listen that, for national security reasons, the United States needed to take over Greenland, amicably if possible or by force if necessary. While many were shocked by Trump’s imperialistic statements, most people, at least in this country, took his words as ill-considered bluster. But he kept telling questioners that he had to have Greenland (oftenechoing the former King of France, Louis XIV who famously said, “L’État c’est moi!”.

Since 1951, the U.S. has had a security agreement with Denmark giving it near total freedom to install and operate whatever military facilities it wanted on Greenland. At one point there were sixteen small bases across the island, now there’s only one. Denmark’s Prime Minister has told President Trump that the U.S. should feel free to expand its installations if needed. As climate change is starting to allow a future passage from thePacific Ocean to the Arctic, many countries are showing interest in Greenland including Russia and China but this hardly indicates an international crisis as Trump and his subordinates insist.

Keep ReadingShow less
Military hardware as a signpost

It is hard not to equate military spending and purchasing with diplomatic or strategic plans being made, for reasons otherwise unknown. Keeping an eye out for the physical stuff can often begin to shine a light on what’s coming – good and possibly very bad.

Without Congressional specific approval, the Pentagon has awarded a contract to Boeing for $8,600,000,000 (US taxpayer dollars) for another 25 F-15A attack fighters to be given to Israel. Oh, and there’s another 25 more of the F-15EX variant on option, free to Israel as well.

Keep ReadingShow less
Truth and evidence depend on the right to observe

A small group of protesters voice opposition to President Trump's administration and Immigration and Customs Enforcement at Amenia's Fountain Square at the intersection of Route 44 and Route 22 on Saturday, Nov. 8, 2025

Photo by Nathan Miller

The fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, and before him Renée Good, by federal agents in Minnesota is not just a tragedy; it is a warning. In the aftermath, Trump administration officials released an account of events that directly contradicted citizen video recorded at the scene. Those recordings, made by ordinary people exercising their rights, showed circumstances sharply at odds with the official narrative. Once again, the public is asked to choose between the administration’s version of events and the evidence of its own eyes.

This moment underscores an essential truth: the right to record law enforcement is not a nuisance or a provocation; it is a safeguard. As New York Times columnist David French put it, “Citizen video has decisively rebutted the administration’s lies. The evidence of our eyes contradicts the dishonesty of the administration’s words.”

Keep ReadingShow less