TOW releases survey results: Comp Plan says smaller is better

WASHINGTON — At midnight on Friday, May 6, the survey pertaining to the Town of Washington’s (TOW) Comprehensive Plan (CP) closed. It was distributed on Monday, April 11.

Brief history

The questionnaire was conducted online via Survey Monkey. It garnered responses from 690 residents: 486 from the TOW and 184 from the Village of Millbrook (VOM). Another 14 paper surveys were deposited at Town Hall.

A group of local volunteers served on the Comprehensive Plan Review Committee (CPRC). The committee worked with professional consultants from Regrowth  Community Planning & Environmental Associates (RCPEA).

Two focus groups manned by local resident volunteers helped determine the main issues regarding amending the CP.

On Friday, Feb. 26, the CPRC hosted an Open House at the Millbrook firehouse to share what had been discussed thus far, what its consultants had proposed and for residents to share their concerns and ask questions.

On Wednesday, May 25, the CPRC’s findings were submitted. They’re at www.washingtonny.org.

Survey results

Survey respondents were made up of 81% full-time residents and 15% part-time residents; 81% were business owners/operators in the TOW; 56% were business owners/operators in the VOM.

Village residents were more open to new development, as 77% favored amending the CP; only 61% of TOW residents were OK with amending the CP.

Hospitality uses

A total of 412 people said the TOW should update the CP to develop more hospitality venues with certain conditions;  210 respondents disapproved of the TOW doing so.

Location,

location, location

Asked where appropriate locations for additional hospitality uses in the TOW should be permitted, three areas were identified: Within the VOM; within Washington Hollow; and just outside of the VOM.

Fifty-one percent of respondents said hospitality uses would be “appropriate” in the VOM; 24% responded it would be “only possibly appropriate”; and 24% responded it would “not be at all appropriate.”

Washington Hollow was deemed “appropriate” by 48% of respondents; the area just outside of the VOM was deemed “appropriate” by 42% of respondents.

The eastern area of the TOW, the northeast area, northwest area, southwest area and southeast areas were declared the “least appropriate” locations for hospitality uses (43 to 45%).

The hamlet of Mabbettsville received mixed reviews, with 33% of respondents rating it as “inappropriate”; 29% rated it “somewhat appropriate”; and 38% rated it “appropriate.”

The CPRC said the most important factors in determining if a specific location would be appropriate for  hospitality uses included the following data: 84% of respondents said hospitality uses must avoid disturbing sensitive environmental areas; 83% said the architectural scale/character must be compatible with the rural setting in which they are located; 80% said the size of venue/number of guest rooms must be appropriate and in-scale; and 74% said the use must fit in and be in-line with the location.

Respondents noted they would prefer hospitality uses “blend in with the environment around it”; most also wanted “natural resources protected.”

Written comments

Written comments noted “architecture that blends [well] with the surrounding character,” and “the preservation of natural resources” were desired traits for new hospitality uses in the TOW.

The consensus was that four to 10 rooms is “appropriate” (73 to 60%, respectively); 20 rooms was considered “very appropriate,” “somewhat appropriate”  to “not appropriate at all” (30 to 36 to 27%).

Larger venues (30, 40 and 50 or more rooms) were not seen as appropriate, especially venues with 40 to 50 or more rooms, which only received 71 to 81% approval, respectively.

The size of the venue’s property was important, as were other factors that could draw customers to the area to help generate tax dollars and possibly create more job opportunities.

Drawing visitors, and problems

Some survey respondents were more interested in whether adding hospitality uses to the CP would mean Millbrook and the TOW could accommodate more tourists and increase its cultural offerings for residents as well, which respondents said could benefit existing buildings and local resources.

Some fears that were raised centered on added traffic, the loss of the area’s “charm and quaintness” and of its rural character.

There were also concerns expressed about protecting local resources and dealing with issues affecting municipal water and sewer, road maintenance and emergency services.

Others were worried about noise, light and environmental pollution and whether such venues would be priced so locals would be able to enjoy their benefits as well. The possibility of an uptick in crime was also raised, as were concerns about village parking becoming even more scarce than it is now.

Residents were generally in favor of how local restaurants, bars, shops and other businesses would benefit, including outdoor recreational and sporting venues, including spas and equestrian farms, wineries and other hot spots known in the Millbrook area.

However,  condominiums, camping/glamping and/or other types of lodging and on-site residences were strongly opposed by the majority of respondents. Opinions on short term-rentals were mixed.

Final comments reiterated that residents want to preserve the town and village’s rural character and charm, cultural offerings, increase entertainment venues and refrain from developing large-scale resorts.

One concept that resulted from the survey was that more non-hospitality commercial uses, such as restaurants, recreation and entertainment venues (i.e. a movie theater), would be beneficial to the TOW.

Some respondents stressed the town needs to create affordable housing to draw new residents from different income brackets, and it must protect the local environment and open spaces before they are lost forever. To see the survey results, go to www.washingtonny.org.

Latest News

Eight dead geese found in Millerton pond, bird flu testing underway

File photo

Photo by Kaitlin Lyle

MILLERTON — Environmental investigators recovered eight dead Canada geese from a pond in Millerton on Jan. 22, prompting testing for highly pathogenic avian influenza, commonly known as bird flu.

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation confirmed in a statement that the birds are undergoing testing, though results were not available at press time.

Keep ReadingShow less
Local group urges Millerton officials to publicly condemn ICE tactics

The Millerton Village offices on North Elm Avenue.

Photo by Aly Morrissey
“I urge you to be public in showing our community your moral compasses,” Millerton resident Eliot Ramos said. “Please show us that we have elected people who really do care.”

MILLERTON — Immigration enforcement became a central focus of the Village Board of Trustees meeting Tuesday, Jan. 27, which drew a group of residents who called on officials to take a public stance in support of vulnerable community members.

Following routine agenda items, community members used the public comment period to urge the board to publicly oppose Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity and affirm protections for local residents. It marked the fourth time in eight months that residents have appeared before the village board to urge action on immigration enforcement, with no significant action or policy change to date.

Keep ReadingShow less
Millerton’s 175th committee advances plans for celebration, seeks vendors and sponsors

The Millerton 175th anniversary committee's tent during the village's trunk-or-treat event on Oct. 31, 2025.

Photo provided

MILLERTON — As Millerton officially enters its 175th year, the volunteer committee tasked with planning its milestone celebration is advancing plans and firming up its week-long schedule of events, which will include a large community fair at Eddie Collins Memorial Park and a drone light show. The events will take place this July 11 through 19.

Millerton’s 175th committee chair Lisa Hermann said she is excited for this next phase of planning.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why the focus on Greenland?

As I noted here in an article last spring entitled “Hands off Greenland”, the world’s largest island was at the center of a developing controversy. President Trump was telling all who would listen that, for national security reasons, the United States needed to take over Greenland, amicably if possible or by force if necessary. While many were shocked by Trump’s imperialistic statements, most people, at least in this country, took his words as ill-considered bluster. But he kept telling questioners that he had to have Greenland (oftenechoing the former King of France, Louis XIV who famously said, “L’État c’est moi!”.

Since 1951, the U.S. has had a security agreement with Denmark giving it near total freedom to install and operate whatever military facilities it wanted on Greenland. At one point there were sixteen small bases across the island, now there’s only one. Denmark’s Prime Minister has told President Trump that the U.S. should feel free to expand its installations if needed. As climate change is starting to allow a future passage from thePacific Ocean to the Arctic, many countries are showing interest in Greenland including Russia and China but this hardly indicates an international crisis as Trump and his subordinates insist.

Keep ReadingShow less