Low Road Sharon hearing extended

Low Road Sharon hearing extended

The Sharon Town Hall was packed for the Low Road hearing on Wednesday, Aug. 13.

Alec Linden

SHARON — It was standing room only Wednesday, Aug. 13, for the second round of public hearing for an application by arts nonprofit Low Road Sharon to develop an office space and events facility adjacent to the North Main Street shopping plaza.

Land Surveyor James McTigue of Arthur H. Howland & Associates and Conley Rollins representing the nonprofit presented changes to the proposal since the last hearing. The alterations were made in response to queries from residents and officials alike for more specific plans for the usage of the site and clarification on development specifications such as lighting, parking and landscaping.

McTigue said the new plans remove three of the tall pedestrian light fixtures to limit any lighting interference with abutters and Lovers Lane, which has no street lighting.

He stated there would be “no lighting on the backside of the property” adjacent to Lovers Lane. He noted that the lighting structures to be used follow “dark sky” principles, focusing their illumination downwards, not outwards, to mitigate spread. The lights will be timed to turn off no later than 9:30 p.m.

It was specified that the north building would be used primarily as an extension of the office space in the south building, but with the added capacity for cultural programming such as readings, exhibitions, and performances, hosted by Low Road Sharon, other local non-profits or the town. These events, which would be free of charge and open to the public, will be capped at 78 guests and end by 9 p.m., and there would be no external commercial use or rented events in the building.

Public comment yielded several more queries about traffic impact to Lovers Lane, to which McTigue responded that there is “no expected increase of traffic on Lovers Lane” as all parking is in on-site lots accessed from Low Road with overflow behind the NBT Bank on North Main Street.

A letter from Cassandra Hess on behalf of Thomas and Margaret Youngberg, residents on Lovers Lane, asked for several clarifications in the proposal, including a detailed tree removal plan, further lighting alterations and specification of the usage of a proposed walkway along a stream on the property, among other concerns. The letter states that abutting property owners have “significant concerns over the scale and impact of the current proposal.”

Two other letters read into the record showed support for the project. Stephanie Plunkett of Kirk Road argued that “creative industries… are powerful engines of local prosperity” and “enrich our sense of place and community identity.”

Nick Moore, who’s family farm sits on Low Road, described Jasper Johns, the celebrated painter, and Low Road Sharon as “good neighbors” and that the plans are “a big improvement over the existing structures” currently located at 1 Low Road.

The applicant filed for a 65-day extension of the hearing to formally respond to comments raised at the meeting. The hearing will be continued at the next P&Z meeting, scheduled for Sept. 10.

Latest News

Local group urges Millerton officials to publicly condemn ICE tactics

The Millerton Village offices on North Elm Avenue.

Photo by Aly Morrissey
“I urge you to be public in showing our community your moral compasses,” Millerton resident Eliot Ramos said. “Please show us that we have elected people who really do care.”

MILLERTON — Immigration enforcement became a central focus of the Village Board of Trustees meeting Tuesday, Jan. 27, which drew a group of residents who called on officials to take a public stance in support of vulnerable community members.

Following routine agenda items, community members used the public comment period to urge the board to publicly oppose Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity and affirm protections for local residents. It marked the fourth time in eight months that residents have appeared before the village board to urge action on immigration enforcement, with no significant action or policy change to date.

Keep ReadingShow less
Millerton’s 175th committee advances plans for celebration, seeks vendors and sponsors

The Millerton 175th anniversary committee's tent during the village's trunk-or-treat event on Oct. 31, 2025.

Photo provided

MILLERTON — As Millerton officially enters its 175th year, the volunteer committee tasked with planning its milestone celebration is advancing plans and firming up its week-long schedule of events, which will include a large community fair at Eddie Collins Memorial Park and a drone light show. The events will take place this July 11 through 19.

Millerton’s 175th committee chair Lisa Hermann said she is excited for this next phase of planning.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why the focus on Greenland?

As I noted here in an article last spring entitled “Hands off Greenland”, the world’s largest island was at the center of a developing controversy. President Trump was telling all who would listen that, for national security reasons, the United States needed to take over Greenland, amicably if possible or by force if necessary. While many were shocked by Trump’s imperialistic statements, most people, at least in this country, took his words as ill-considered bluster. But he kept telling questioners that he had to have Greenland (oftenechoing the former King of France, Louis XIV who famously said, “L’État c’est moi!”.

Since 1951, the U.S. has had a security agreement with Denmark giving it near total freedom to install and operate whatever military facilities it wanted on Greenland. At one point there were sixteen small bases across the island, now there’s only one. Denmark’s Prime Minister has told President Trump that the U.S. should feel free to expand its installations if needed. As climate change is starting to allow a future passage from thePacific Ocean to the Arctic, many countries are showing interest in Greenland including Russia and China but this hardly indicates an international crisis as Trump and his subordinates insist.

Keep ReadingShow less
Military hardware as a signpost

It is hard not to equate military spending and purchasing with diplomatic or strategic plans being made, for reasons otherwise unknown. Keeping an eye out for the physical stuff can often begin to shine a light on what’s coming – good and possibly very bad.

Without Congressional specific approval, the Pentagon has awarded a contract to Boeing for $8,600,000,000 (US taxpayer dollars) for another 25 F-15A attack fighters to be given to Israel. Oh, and there’s another 25 more of the F-15EX variant on option, free to Israel as well.

Keep ReadingShow less