Should Trump be banned from Facebook, Twitter?

“Not freedom for the thought of those who agree with us, but freedom for the thought that we hate.”

 

This profound observation on free speech by the great American jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes has exceptions, which Holmes made clear in another First Amendment decision by noting that “speech that is false and dangerous is not protected” and no one is permitted  the freedom of “shouting ‘fire’ in a crowded theater, causing panic.” 

The Holmes remarks came to mind when pondering the decision by Facebook and Twitter to ban former president Trump indefinitely after he inspired a crowd to storm the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

Holmes’s words on the thoughts we hate are from a dissenting opinion in a 1929 Supreme Court  decision that blocked the citizenship application of a Hungarian immigrant named Rosika Schwimmer.

Schwimmer, in applying for the application, revealed that as a pacifist, she would not be willing to take up arms in defense of the United States. Even though Americans then, as now, had the right to conscientiously object to military service, the majority ruled that Schwimmer did not enjoy a citizen’s rights. 

Over the years, Holmes’s ideas  about limits on free speech had evolved. In 1919. he was part of a unanimous Court finding that the distribution of anti-draft leaflets  represented a clear and present danger to government recruitment in wartime.  He even likened the leafleting to falsely shouting fire in a theater.

But when wartime fever subsided, Holmes had second thoughts and in another leaflets case aimed at Russian immigrants supporting the Bolshevik Revolution.  “A silly leaflet by unknown men,” he wrote, was not a clear and present danger to the nation and “should not be illegal.” 

So how does all of this judicial thinking apply to the facts surrounding former president Trump’s loss of the use of Facebook  and Twitter because of the role his words played in inciting  the Jan.6 insurrection?

This final act of Trump’s tumultuous presidency resulted in death and destruction when his supporters attacked the Capitol while Congress was counting the 2020 electoral votes.  It was surely akin to falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater and was both dangerous and false.  And it was definitely not a silly speech by an unknown person. 

But Facebook is a private company and such organizations are not subject to the First Amendment. However, that doesn’t mean the  ban was fair and proper and Facebook had an independent committee of notables conduct an inquiry into its actions against Trump.

Former federal judge Michael McConnell, the co-chairman of that independent  committee, has pointed out there was no violation of the First Amendment because private companies can, indeed, violate the amendment.  Facebook and other social media can block whatever it deems unsuitable for whatever reason. However, they do so at the risk of offending public opinion, also known as their customers. Not to mention the trust busters in Congress, who can and do make laws upholding freedom of speech.

The committee  also noted Facebook doesn’t treat all of its users equally and needs to take a hard look at its standards before it finds Congress taking a hard look at its anti-trust status.  It criticized Trump’s ban and asked Facebook to reconsider.

What could amount to a lifetime ban on a former president, no matter how disreputable his conduct, is troubling.  This is especially true in Trump’s case if he follows through on his threat to run again in 2024. Every candidate should enjoy equal opportunity to reach voters.

And even though the First Amendment doesn’t apply here, our collective consciences should not ignore Holmes’s admonition about the truth we agree with and the truth we hate.

While writing this coIumn, I came upon another memorable admonition that has haunted me since I first read it as a student. It was made in 1930s by the great German theologian Martin Neimoller:

“First they came for the socialists but I did not speak out because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists but I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews but I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me.”

And I thought maybe it was time to speak out, even for Donald Trump.

 

Simsbury resident Dick Ahles is a retired journalist. Email him at rahles1@outlook.com.

The views expressed here are not necessarily those of The Millerton News and The News does not support or oppose candidates for public office.

Latest News

Dutchess County DWI crackdown set for Super Bowl weekend

Drivers should expect more police on the roads this weekend as law enforcement warns of ramped-up DWI check-points over Super Bowl weekend.

Photo by Aly Morrissey

Law enforcement is expected to ramp up DWI check-points across the region this weekend.

Across Dutchess County, local law enforcement agencies will take part in a “high-visibility enforcement effort” during Super Bowl weekend aimed at preventing drivers from operating vehicles under the influence of drugs and alcohol. Increased patrols and sobriety checkpoints are planned throughout the county from Sunday, Feb. 8, through Monday, Feb. 9.

Keep ReadingShow less
Housatonic students hold day of silence to protest ICE

Students wore black at Housatonic Valley Regional High School Friday, Jan. 30, while recognizing a day of silence to protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Mia DiRocco

FALLS VILLAGE — In the wake of two fatal shootings involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in Minnesota, students across the country have organized demonstrations to protest the federal agency. While some teens have staged school walkouts or public protests, students at Housatonic Valley Regional High School chose a quieter approach.

On Friday, Jan. 30, a group of HVRHS students organized a voluntary “day of silence,” encouraging participants to wear black as a form of peaceful protest without disrupting classes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Proposed ICE facility in Chester faces regional opposition
A Google Street View image of the former Pep Boys warehouse on Elizabeth Drive in Chester, New York, where the U.S. Department of Homeland Security plans to
maps.app.goo.gl

A proposed deportation processing center in Chester, New York, has sparked widespread backlash from local residents and advocates across the Hudson Valley.

The Department of Homeland Security issued a public notice on Jan. 8 outlining the plan, which calls for Immigration and Customs Enforcement to purchase and convert a warehouse at 29 Elizabeth Drive in Chester “in support of ICE operations.” The facility, located in Orange County, is a former Pep Boys distribution warehouse that was previously used to store tires and auto parts.

Keep ReadingShow less
Extreme cold exposes warming center gaps 
in northeast Dutchess

Millerton's American Legion Post 178 on Route 44. Bob Jenks, who is involved in leadership at the legion, said the building could operate as an emergency warming shelter if North East or Millerton officials reached out with a need for one.

Photo by Nathan Miller

Much of New York state was pummeled with snow in late January, followed by a prolonged stretch of below-freezing temperatures and wind chills dipping as low as negative 15 degrees, prompting cold weather advisories urging people to stay indoors.

Despite the extreme cold, there are few clearly designated warming centers in the rural areas of northern or eastern Dutchess County, leaving residents in need with limited nearby options.

Keep ReadingShow less